Thursday, May 23, 2013

Bamboo Wars - An Act Regulating the Planting and Sale of Running Bamboo


AN ACT REGULATING THE PLANTING AND SALE OF RUNNING BAMBOO.


               The Bamboo Wars continued today in Connecticut, a state that has been trying to mitigate the damage of certain plants since at least 1726 (Connecticut keeps trying to ban plants Invasive Notes (2010))  Today the Connecticut House of Representatives voted (130 yea; 3 nay; 17 absent according to a source involved in the creation and support of the legislation) to concur with a Senate bill that makes it possible for a landowner faced with unwanted incursions of a neighboring planting of certain bamboo species liable for the cost of making the aggrieved property owner whole. A property owner subjected to uncontrolled growth of running bamboo from a neighboring property will have means to recover costs incurred by the removal and mitigation of the plant. The point of the bill is to place the burden of the cost of damages to an uninfested property onto the shoulders and pocketbook of the person who chose to plant running bamboo and let it run unfettered.

               The mission of the landowners who are faced with the rampant spread of running bamboo is to place the cost of control back onto the original planter rather than the receiver. Traditionally unsuspecting neighbors were condemned to pay for the control of a plant they never asked for and most certainly never planted. Historically people turned to plant bans which while perhaps reducing future establishment through intentional introductions, did little to relieve the costs for those stuck with the externalization of the cost of management by those who found reason to plant running bamboo in the first place. The result in a few cases has led to a form of terrorism by bamboo, and expensive control costs in most cases.

               The specific species behind the Bamboo Wars in Connecticut is Phyllostachys aureosulcata McClure (1945) affecting primarily cities, suburbs, home gardens and their surrounding areas,The species can damage sidewalks and driveways, destroy swimming pools, invades septic systems, establish in turf and lawns, and shade out other vegetation (Rickel, 2012). Multiple townships have established ordinances restricting the planting and growth of running bamboos, and many of those specifically target Phyllostachys spp. (e.g.,Brookhaven NY, 2012; West Bradford PA, 2011). The species forms monocultures (Ward, 2011) which changes community structure in natural areas.(USDA APHIS 2012).








0
               

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Maryland needs a law like this. NOW!

Anonymous said...

In 1978 the neighbor behind us moved and the new owners of the home did not keep the bamboo cut down along the back fence as the previous owner had done....that summer there was a tall, verty thick 'fence' of running bamboos....
And now that it was given free will to grow it as sending rhyzons into our yard.... it was coming thru the wood floor in our shed, it was heading also towards our vinyl lined ingroud pool..
Sid some research and found out that County Atty Adam Wojciak had just had a case where he found for the 'victim' of the same thing in Cabin John Md just 2 years prior. The bamboo owners had to put in a cement barrier along their fence to keep their bamboo home.
Well, we filed........Only to find now the County (*Montgomery) was ruling that Bamboo was an orimental grass and had a right to grow 'free'...
We had no help.
So that summer my husband and sons started putting in a wall in our yard.
The county extension said that the wall would have to go down at least 3 feet below ground and be at least 4 inches thick...
That became a painstaking JOB...........
We had to also had to take on the cost of it..........a couple of thousand dollars out of our pocket.

Our insurance company was of no help with the new ruling that it was an ornimental grass....

The barrier has helped us.thyough the bamboo does go around it on the ends...........a never ending worry............all these years later.
Atleast the newest owners of the house behind us do keep it cut down to about 7 feet in height and do rake through it to remove the weeds, and trash that does blow in and get trapped.........
We live in Aspen Hill - Rockville MD

Anonymous said...

Just doesn't seem right that one has to spend several thousands of dollars to safe their own yard...There should be some fund or something that helps people like us who had to go to this expense etc
It sure left a bitter taste in our mothes..