Showing posts with label NAL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NAL. Show all posts

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Yokohama squash - Not Every New Plant is Invasive


Gregory Yokohama squash - USDA ARS NAL "Special Collections"


               Thomas Jefferson wrote that "the greatest service which can be rendered any country is to add an useful plant to it's culture...."[1] He could hardly imagine the unintended consequence and impact that the introduction of non indigenous species has had on the ecosystems and economies of the United States. The spread of invasive species alters ecosystem services and threaten rare and endangered species; second only to land development practices in their destructive impact. It is easy, therefore, to condemn the actions of past generations who worked hard to find new and novel species to enhance the quality of life of their fellow citizens.

               Jefferson noted that the United States were "probably far from possessing, as yet, all the articles of culture [crops] for which nature has fitted our country. To find out these, will require an abundance of unsuccessful experiments. But if, in a multitude of these, we make one or two useful acquisitions, it repays our trouble."[2] Those whom have had to fight kudzu or tamarisk might take umbrage and even be outraged at the idea that the introduced species that did not find merit were paid for.

               The US Department o Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) was established in part to foster Jefferson's idea that "[t]he introduction of new cultures [crops], and especially of objects [plants] of leading importance to our comfort, is certainly worthy the attention of every government, and nothing short of the actual experiment should discourage an essay of which an hope can be entertained."[3]

               Because of the significant harm of a few intentionally or accidentally introduced plants, certain stakeholders have taken a dim view to non-native plants and to those who introduced them to the United States. This tendency to lump all exotic plants into one basket is based on part on a limited view of history and the role of the men who introduced important non-native species such as wheat and vegetables. Only 150 years ago, men such as Thomas Hogg, Jr. and James J. H. Gregory worked to better the produce of our farms and gardens sure in the knowledge that they were contributing to the betterment of the country and its people.

               An 1866 article in The Cultivator & Country Gentleman provides an example of a then recent introduction of a new winter squash from Japan.

" THE YOKOHAMA SQUASH Eds Co Gent The past summer we raised Yokohama Squash and it has given such good satisfaction both as a table squash and for pies that think its merits need only to be known in order it may be appreciated The vines of this new visitor from Japan slowly till some time in July when they spread rapidly on every side taking root at almost every joint and throwing out numerous side branches so that when planted eight feet apart the entire ground is occupied by the dark green leaves while the numerous peculiar looking squashes are thickly hidden beneath them I find that they yielded with us the past season from 20 to 30 squashes to the square rod averaging four or five pounds each They are very heavy in proportion to their size the seeds being small and contained in a very small cavity The flesh is very dry sweet fine grained and of a rich orange color When cooked they make the best substitute for sweet potatoes of anything I know of and for pies I think them equal to any other squash They ripened here in Connecticut the past season but required the entire season in order to mature before frost The keep very well but 1 think not quite as well as Hubbard The stems of the Yokohama where they join the squash are nearly square a peculiarity never saw in any other squash I have no seeds spare as they are already disposed of G. F. P. Milford, Conn Feb 7 1866."[4]

William Woys Weaver (2005) describes the squash as a "oddly shaped squash that resembled large chunks of hardened lava. Gray-black, other-worldly, yet hauntingly beautiful, this unique heirloom vegetable from Japan, the ‘Yokohama’ squash, was a visual study in the Japanese affection for serenity through form and texture. [The Yokohama squash has] one of the most complex flavors I have run across in any squash or pumpkin I have grown. Everyone’s taste buds are different, but I detect hints of Asian pear, mango, avocado, lemon balsam, and if you have experience with tropical fruits, the unmistakable aroma of sapote. Can this be a squash? It is even a great boon to gardeners because it is highly resistant to borers and powdery mildew."[5]

               Who were Hogg and Gregory? Thomas Hogg, Jr. was born in London, February 6, 1820, coming to the United States with his father, Thomas Hogg, Sr. and his brother James when he was 9 months old. His father was a successful nurseryman and florist in New York City. He and his brother took over the business when their father diedin I855. A staunch liberal, progressive Republican, Thomas Hogg, Jr. was appointed U. S. Marshall in 1862 by President Lincoln, who also founded USDA and sent to Japan for eight years. He would return thereafter for two more years at a posting in the Custom House. He spent much time in travelling around the Japanese Islands studying their flora since his official position afforded him unusual facilities for exploration and collection of novel and interesting plant species and cultivars. He made a large collection of Japanese trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants "among those which proved to be adapted to our climate, are many of the choicest Japanese plants which ornament our gardens to-day, which he was the first to introduce."[6]  

               James Hogg grew the seeds sent from Japan by his brother reporting the "outcome in an 1864 issue of The Magazine of Horticulture. Hogg named the variety "Yokohama" and said it was superior to the Hubbard types which were at the time the standard in American gardens."[7] James Hogg  sent seeds of the Yokohama squash to the noted Massachusetts  plantsman, James John Howard Gregory. Mr. Gregory advertised the new squash in 1865 in Marblehead.[8]    

               I was delighted to find an original copy of the handbill advertising the Yokohama squash while compiling an inventory of pre-1870 nursery catalogs in the Special Collection of the U. S. National Agricultural Library. (USDA ARS NAL)




[1] Thomas Jefferson Memorandum of Services to My Country, after 2 September 1800  PTJ, 32:124. Polygraph copy at the Library of Congress.

[2] Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Drayton (1786). Thomas Jefferson Agricultural Institute http://www.jeffersoninstitute.org/initiative/jefferson.shtml

[3] Letter from Thomas Jefferson to M. Lasteyrie (1808) Thomas Jefferson Agricultural Institute. http://www.jeffersoninstitute.org/initiative/jefferson.shtml- (In other words, test the new crop before assuming it has nothing to offer.)

 [4] The Cultivator & Country Gentleman, Volume 27 L. Tucker & Son, 1866.

[5] Weaver. 2005. Yokohama Squash. Online. Accessed July 14, 2013. http://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/yokohama-squash.aspx#axzz2Z2JTu6GK

[6] Morong, T. (1893). Thomas Hogg. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 20(5), 217–218. doi:10.2307/2477496
Author's npte: Kudzu, which he sent to Thomas Meehan, noted nuseryman in Philadelphia in 1876, not withstanding...

[7] Baker Creek Heirloom Seed Company. Online. Accessed July 14, 2013. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=165630743551869&id=155935376162

[8] Shari Kelley Worrell & Norma Lovett Gregory Kelley Flude. A Timeline of his life.  Online. Accessed July 14, 2013. http://www.saveseeds.org/biography/gregory/
Mr. Gregory purchased the rights to the "best white potato" for $150 from Luther Burbank.  Mr. Gregory introduced a new potato that he shared with Luther Burbank calling it "Burbank".


Monday, August 20, 2012

USDA-ARS NAL - National Agricultural Library

from: 

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pomological Watercolor Collection


           
                                   The National Agricultural Library's Abraham Lincoln Building (USDA_ARS NAL) is located in Beltsville, Maryland, 15 miles northeast of Washington, DC, near the intersection of U.S. Route 1 and Interstates 95 and 495 (Beltway Exit 25-North). The Library occupies a 14-story building on the grounds of USDA's Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC). On May 15, 1862, Abraham Lincoln signed into law the Agricultural Act that established the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The newly created Department the newly-created Department of Agriculture and the Secretary of Agriculture were and are charged with the duty "to acquire and preserve in his Department all information concerning agriculture which he can obtain by means of books and correspondence." In 1864, USDA received appropriations that included for $4,000 for the library and laboratory.

               Today, the National Agricultural Library is one of five national libraries of the United States. It houses one of the world's largest and most accessible agricultural information collections, if not indeed the largest and serves as the nexus for a national network of state land-grant and U.S. Department of Agriculture field libraries. In fiscal year 2011 (Oct 2010 through Sept 2011) NAL delivered more than 100 million direct customer service transactions.

               The Special Collections of USDA_ARS NAL houses rare books including Fuchs and Linnaeus originals, manuscript collections, nearly 300,000 nursery and seed trade catalogs, photographs, and posters including  original Smokey the Bear art work, and books, paitings and art from the 1500s to the present. Materials cover a variety of agricultural subjects including horticulture, entomology, poultry sciences, natural history, and are not limited to domestic publications. As part of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library is charged with arranging, describing, preserving and making available rare materials significant to the history of agriculture and the USDA.

               "More than 100 white boxes fill shelf after shelf of the fifth floor at the National Agricultural Library (NAL), sheltering secrets of U.S. Department of Agriculture parasite investigations from 1886 to 1987. The boxes are filled with line drawings, photographs, lantern slides, research notes, documents, and correspondence that represent the early history of parasitology work, especially in taxonomy and systematics, conducted over the past 100 years and more by USDA scientists."  

Fast Facts:
·        Time period: 1886 to 1942, with the majority created between 1894 and 1916.
·        Content: 7,584 watercolor paintings, lithographs and line drawings, including 3,807 images of apples.
·        Fruit origins: The plant specimens illustrated originated in 29 countries and 51 states and territories in the U.S.
·        Artists: The paintings were created by approximately twenty-one artists commissioned by USDA for this purpose. Some works are not signed.
·        Reproductions: NAL can provide, for a fee, high quality prints and digital files of the images. Please refer to the "Buy Rare and Special Collections Products.".



Thursday, August 09, 2012

Help keep the National Invasive Species Information Center website program up, funded and operational (NISIC)


               I am asking you to help keep the National Invasive Species Information Center website program up, funded and operational. (NISIC) which is a program of USDA-ARS NAL, is under the financial knife and as part of the incessant focus on cutting the federal programs this vital infrastructure is now targeted to help off set deficit spending in other places in the government. The idea that information for the public good should be privatized is wrong on so many levels, but here with invasive species because of the global nature and local consequence, only a public site can provide equal access to all users.

               Please add a comment to this post, and write to the Secretary of Agriculture and the US Congress. If you have time, write to USDA ARS NAL directly. I have rarely asked for anything, but now we have little time. Please add your comments to this posting today. Just a few words...volume is what counts. KEEP NISIC FUNDED is all you have to say, but of course telling them why it is important helps too.


Tell them to find the money to keep information freely flowing.

               NISIC is the gateway to invasive species information; covering Federal, State, local, and international sources. Most of the work on invasive species has long since been defunded and is now handled by volunteers who valiantly war against novel non indigenous species that are wreaking havoc and altering our ecosystems and the services they provide. The volunteers will be in no position to spend money to access information on early detection, rapid response, control methods, taxonomic, regulatory, and legislative initiatives if we privatize this information, and, because the volunteers have no money, accordingly it will not be offered.

At the NISIC website, you can keep current on the following invasive species issues:
·        Join a Discussion List
·        Read About Emerging Issues
·        Find Press Releases
·        Read Newsletters
·        Read Success Stories
Also on the NISIC website you can:
·        Us the A-Z Index or other Helpful Resources
·        Find Databases
·        Find Species Profiles (Animals, Aquatic Species, Microbes, and Plants)
·        Find USDA Publications
·        Locate Experts
·        Locate Images
·        Ask A Question
·        Find U.S. Information
·        Locate Experts
o   Read the Executive Order 13112 (established the National Invasive Species Council)
NISIC is a resource for Students and Teachers:
·        Learn About Plant Names and Taxonomy (USDA, NAL)
·        Find Species Profiles (Animals, Aquatic Species, Microbes, and Plants)
·        Locate Graduate Programs
·        Ask A Question
And, NISIC is an information source for professionals:
·        Attend a Conference
·        Find Conference Proceedings
·        Locate Graduate Programs
·        Search for Journal Articles
·        Find Grant Information


Friday, April 10, 2009

Solicitation of Input From Stakeholders on the Roadmap for the National Agricultural Library

The National Agricultural Library (NAL), the largest in the world, is the keeper of the nation's information on food, fuel, feed, fiber, flowers, and forests. They have recently offered for public comment a roadmap for the future. Contrary to the thinking of some, libraries such as NAL have a purpose and fulfill a need supplying the basic information that fuels and feeds the Internet and our national research into fundamental issues of quality of life. If punlic accessibility to knowledge is imprtant to you, please tahe the time to comment.

Solicitation of Input From Stakeholders on the Roadmap for Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension
AGENCY: Research, Education, and Economics Office, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of public comment period for written stakeholder input.-----------------------------------------------------------------------SUMMARY: The Research, Education, and Extension Office (REEO) of the Research, Education, and Economics (REE) Mission Area of the Department of Agriculture (USDA) is requesting written stakeholder input on the preparation of a roadmap for agricultural research, education, and extension at USDA. The preparation of the Roadmap is mandated by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008. By this notice, the Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics has been designated to act on behalf of the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) in soliciting public comment from interested parties regarding the preparation of the Roadmap.DATES: All written comments must be received by 5 p.m. EST, May 31, 2009, to be considered.ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by REE-2009-0001, by any of the following methods:[[Page 14768]] Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. E-mail: Roadmap@osec.usda.gov. Include REE-2009-0001 in the subject line of the message. Fax: (202) 690-1677. Mail: Paper, disk or CD-ROM submissions should be submitted to: Michele Simmons; Research, Education, and Extension Office (REEO); U.S. Department of Agriculture; Mail Stop 0114; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 20250-0114. Hand Delivery/Courier: Michele Simmons; Research, Education, and Extension Office (REEO); U.S. Department of Agriculture; Room 3858-S; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 20250-0114. Instructions: All submissions received must include the title ``Roadmap'' and REE-2009-0001. All comments received will be posted to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Simmons, (202) 720-1777 (phone), (202) 690-1677 (fax), or Roadmap@osec.usda.gov.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:Additional Comment Procedures Information on the REEO and Roadmap is available for review at http://www.ree.usda.gov. Written comments must be received by 5 p.m. EST, May 31, 2009, to be considered. All comments, when they become available, may be reviewed on the REE Web page for six months.Background and Purpose The preparation of the roadmap for agricultural research, education, and extension is mandated in section 7504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008, (Pub. L. 110-246, 7 U.S.C. 7614a. The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Education (Under Secretary), will prepare the Roadmap. The Secretary will implement and use the Roadmap to set the agricultural research, education, and extension agenda of the Department of Agriculture. The Under Secretary is also the Chief Scientist for USDA, responsible for the coordination of the research, education, and extension activities of the Department. [7 U.S.C. 6971(c)]. The Research, Education, and Extension Office (REEO) recently organized within the Office of the Under Secretary is the office that provides such coordination, per 7 U.S.C. 6971(e)(1). Therefore the Office of the Chief Scientist and Under Secretary is inviting input on the Roadmap to be provided to the REEO by all interested parties from the Federal Government and nongovernmental entities. The Roadmap will identify current trends and constraints and major opportunities and gaps that no single entity within the Department of Agriculture would be able to address individually. Stakeholder input is encouraged on any and all aspects of the development and implementation of the Roadmap, including responses to the following questions: 1. What types of current and future critical issues (including those affecting citizens, communities and natural resources) does agriculture face that no USDA entity could address individually? 2. What criteria should USDA use to prioritize agricultural science (i.e., research, education, and extension) investments to address these issues? 3. How might USDA better coordinate agricultural sciences among its various agencies and with its partners? 4. What are some examples where agricultural sciences are successfully coordinated for maximum benefit? Why are they successful? 5. What are some examples where agricultural sciences are not coordinated effectively? Why is coordination lacking? What are the barriers? 6. What else might USDA do to improve coordination of science; enhance USDA's ability to identify issues and prioritize investments; and elevate its role in science implementation and coordination?Implementation Plans The Under Secretary and the REEO plan to consider stakeholder input received from written comments in developing the Roadmap. The Secretary will make the Roadmap available to the public, with an expected publication date of not later than September 16, 2009. Done at Washington, DC, this 4th day of March, 2009.Katherine Smith,Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Research, Education, and Economics. [FR Doc. E9-7252 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]

Sunday, March 01, 2009

Agricultural Food Research "USA ARS - BARC & NAL"Needs Stimulating

I have written, I suppose rather obtusely given the lack of any progress, on the need for fundamental, basic agricultural research of the infrastructure science variety. As a friend remarked recently, there have been no new food crops added to our menu in around 10,000 years. We therefore have to find ways to make what we have work with whatever the climate situation is at our time in history. But instead of funding this research in the next generation of food, we ignore the entire issue. Our National Agricultural Research Center , BARC, has lost almost half of its researchers in the last 20 years, and we continue to do nothing. Our National Agricultural Library, NAL, cannot even purchase foreign science journals to see what the rest of the world is doing. For some strange reason, we as a people think everything we need to know is on Google and that new crops can be had within an 18 month granting cycle at a university. We have lost our minds and soon, perhaps, our productive sources of food. I wonder if anyone is listening?

AGRICULTURE: World needs to breed climate-proof crops, experts say (Friday, February 27, 2009) The world has very little time left to develop new seed varieties to tackle climate change and stave off food shortages that could affect billions, experts said. People in Africa and Asia are most at risk from a lack of climate-proof crops, they said, speaking yesterday on the first anniversary of the opening of a "doomsday" seed vault on the island of Spitsbergen in the Norwegian Arctic. The vault, cut from icy rock 600 miles from the North Pole, opened on Feb. 26, 2008, and has doubled its holdings to 200 million seeds in the past year, representing 400,000 varieties. It is meant to be a fail-safe for national collections and to serve as a sort of Noah's Ark in case of a disaster such as nuclear war. The bank has the capacity to hold about 4.5 million samples, or 2 billion seeds. "We need some tremendous advances," said David Battisti, an atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Washington. "The whole world will be stressed at the same time" because of global warming. Crops can take a decade to breed and test. And crops cannot simply be moved to new areas as the climate warms because soils, pests, insect pollinators, daylight hours and other factors differ even if temperatures seem suitable (Alister Doyle, Reuters, Feb. 25). -- KJH

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Invasive English ivy featured in Newsweek..with a twist



Yes that sure looks like Hedera helix wrapped around the U. S. presidential rostrum. (I checked a hard copy of the article) to verify (it is good to have more than fuzzy virtual renditions and copies).

"Give me your hungry, your homeless your plants which need no spraying, and can survive both drought and flood."

English ivy, an invasive species poster child in the mid-Atlantic, is prominently features in a Newsweek article entitled: A Leadership Reality Check Oratory is not enough. It often takes a national crisis to persuade Americans to make sacrifices.

The article is about climate change and warming, with intense nods towards CO2 changes. It is a call for politicians to ask for public sacrifice. However, it is going to be hard to get the public to make sacrifices when we can not get our vices and virtues straight. Featuring an invasive species, most certainly without knowing that the natural area invader is centered in the picture subconsciously raises the question of what else is not quite right about the information thus presented.

This picture in a sense is a reinforcement of the need for systematics (USDA BARC) and basic taxonomy, fields which we publicly and privately fail to support because we blithely assume that someone some where knows. In addition, this photo found on the Internet refutes the notion that we do not need libraries and their collections (NAL) and more importantly librarians to vet our factoids.

The irony of having an invasive species featured front and center in an environmental call to arms in a reputable news magazine is rich and symptomatic of how far we need to go in order to engage in conversations on an equal playing field with all parties having the same access to information.

Newsweek: April 14, 2008 page 48

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

BARC ARS USDA: THE PARADOX OF POVERTY AND PLENTY

GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS REQUIRES SOLUTIONS

(This essay was sent to the Washington Post in early June 2008 as an editorial which the Post did not consider publishing for their own internal reasons. We can only suppose that sources of food are not yet a critical problem for the Post. We would be delighted to arrange a tour for the Post if they would only take notice of the Los Alamos of Agricultural Research in their own front yard at the Henry A Wallace Agricultural Research Center Beltsville, and the National Agricultural Library)

Food, fiber, fuel, forests, and flowers are the basic fabric of life that we so often take for granted. But wait! The optimism American society has experienced for a safe, affordable and abundant food supply is melting in the face of the reality of modern agriculture. In much of the world, large populations face starvation. Demand for basic food commodities has never been greater and supplies are limited.

Research has provided the breakthrough advances that have resulted in the American consumer being the best--yet most inexpensively--fed population on earth. Americans traditionally have paid less than 10 percent of household income for food. Today, rapid increases in basic commodity prices are taking a much bigger bite out of family paychecks.

The Beltsville Agricultural Research Service (ARS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Beltsville, Maryland, located on the Route 1 corridor between Laurel and College Park, has been on the forefront of providing benefits to farmers and consumers for nearly 100 years. Research in Beltsville is focused on improving plant and animal productivity and developing technologies for sustaining food production while protecting the environment.

In 1959 Nikita Khrushchev, Prime Minister of the Soviet Union, included Beltsville as one of three places he visited in the U.S. Beltsville was the envy of the world in developing state-of-the-art plant and animal products and technology to feed the nation. Major discoveries in the first 50 years include:

The “Beltsville Turkey” in the 1940s, the first turkey with a high content of breast meat is the progenitor of every small white turkey sold in the U.S. today.

The first vaccine was developed to prevent hog cholera, a disease that caused over $100 million losses annually.

The finding that reduced thickness of eggshells was caused by DDT, which was endangering species of birds, including the American eagle.

DEET, the most widely used insect repellent that has saved millions of lives worldwide.

First collection in New Guinea of wild impatiens and breeding new hybrids, among the most widely sold U.S. ornamentals.

The 7,500-acre Beltsville Center typifies the financial strain affecting agricultural research nationwide. Despite the Center’s bright history of achievement, many vital projects and programs have been eliminated because of a lack of funding. One-third of the more than 100 buildings are outdated, crumbling and closed. Others urgently need renovation.

Maintaining and increasing agricultural productivity and sustainability will require major increases in federal funding. From 2005 to 2008 budgets have been flat or declined. The reasons for these reductions are complex. The most difficult funding issues, however, are the increased costs of energy and salaries. For years, these increase costs have been paid from within existing budgets without significant increases in congressional appropriations. So the research and the science have suffered!

Homeland security depends on a safe and sustainable food supply. The research challenge of the 21st century is to achieve this goal in an ever-changing environment. The challenge can be met only if there is an investment in long-term research. Although new methods in biotechnology will shorten the time required for new research achievements, it will take years--not months—before benefits are realized for consumers.

Maintaining collections of higher plants, fungi, insects and nematodes are vital to maintaining homeland security. Beltsville scientists do this daily in cooperation with the Smithsonian Institution, in support of the Animal and Plant Health Protection Service and the Department of Homeland Security. These vital research-related activities protect U.S agriculture from invasion from abroad by harmful insects, fungi and nematode diseases.

Despite limited resources excellent research continues at Beltsville. Recent contributions include:

New technology using aerial digital photography to monitor crop growth, resulting in reduced use of fertilizer and pesticides without reducing crop yield.

Dietary studies performed in state-of-the-art facilities have determined the influence of foods and specific nutrients on obesity and the development of chronic diseases.

Mastitis in cattle costs the U.S. industry $2 billion a year in lost milk
production. Scientists have introduced into cattle a gene encoding a natural protein that makes them resistant to the disease.

Improved methods in crop breeding that have yielded fruits like blueberries and strawberries, vegetables such as tomatoes and potatoes with improved yields, resistance to pests and diseases, and enhanced nutritional quality.

Scientists have developed minimum tillage organic agricultural systems that increases crop yields and enhances soil fertility and environmental quality.

American farmers are making record profits at a time when there are world food shortages. With demand for basic food commodities never greater, current supplies do not meet the demand. Consumers in the U.S. are paying record prices for basic foodstuffs that utilize wheat, corn and soybeans.

There are many reasons for this current imbalance, but pressures on the food supply will not disappear soon. As land is diverted from wheat and corn production for ethanol in gasoline, food prices have soared. Farmers who own land with marginal production capability are now being rewarded with subsidies to encourage production because of a history of prolonged drought.

Will farmers continue to enjoy the current level of productivity? In the U.S. and worldwide, farmers cannot continue to grow crops on depleted soils and continue to get near-maximum yields. Worldwide depleted soil has become an emerging problem. Reduced soil organic matter content cannot be compensated for by repeated additions of inorganic chemical fertilizers.

Changes in climate will predictably change the level of productivity on crop lands here and around the world. In some geographical areas the growing season has lengthened due to global warming; while in other areas growing seasons have become shorter. In some areas, drought will dramatically change how cropland is managed. Crops grown on these lands today will not produce sustainable yields. These crops will have to be modified using new techniques of gene engineering or new tolerant varieties will have to be bred to withstand the increased stress conditions.

Major biotechnology companies are currently producing “climate ready” crops using genetic engineering, but these advances involve the use of patent protected genes. This protected technology will serve shareholder interest, but may not serve the general public interest. Publicly funded research is necessary to develop non-patented genetically transformed stress resistant plants. Federal funding is also required to research alternative crops that will produce the food and fiber needed to sustain our population.

Added to the crisis, rapid changes in air quality have occurred in combination with global warming. The concentration of carbon dioxide has increased more during the industrial revolution than it any time during the last several million years. In addition to carbon dioxide, air quality has been lowered by increases in ozone and other industrial pollutants. Research at Beltsville on the effects of these changes on plant growth and productivity was initiated more than 40 years ago. Results of this research have added important predictive value in assessing the importance of these pollutants on crop yield.

Changes in the environment will alter crop productivity and practices at an ever increasing rate. Understanding the nature of these changes and the associated effects will be essential if our society is to thrive. As Americans we have led the world in developing the most advanced systems for high output crop production. In the past, these goals were often achieved without concern for the environmental consequences. Today, our objective should be to maintain a high level of agricultural productivity while protecting the environment.

U.S. congressional leaders and other citizens should recognize the urgent need to increase funding for agricultural research. The European Union and other parts of the world have arguably taken a lead in performing the agricultural research that will enable their food demands to be met. As a people, we must not wait until the consequences of federal inaction are realized through a diminished food supply both at home and abroad.

It is our national responsibility to ensure that Congress take action to return the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center to the national flagship status that it once held. They must act now to keep the food we Americans enjoy as affordable, safe and abundant.

Roger Lawson, Agricultural Research Service
National Program Leader, retired

John Peter Thompson - Chair, Prince George’s County Chamber of Commerce
President, National Agricultural Alliance-Beltsville

Friday, June 13, 2008

BARC & NAL: The front line in the attack of killer tomatoes and other agents of terror

Today’s security threat seems to be tomatoes. A sudden, overpowering terror, affecting many people at once has struck causing consternation and fear resulting in a reinforcement of some citizens’ natural reluctance to enjoy vegetables. Legislators speak about control and elimination of the problem of unclean vegetables and fruits. They look for ways to legislate the challenge away.

Meanwhile, about twelve miles from the halls of power, the National Center for Agricultural Research, BARC, languishes, withering on the vine, having lost almost half its research capacity over the last decade or more. The United States Department of Agriculture, USDA, which, perhaps, should better be know as the Department of Food, Fuel, Fibers, Flowers and Forests has wide ranging impact on our quality of life, and buried within its huge oversight responsibilities under layers of acronyms is the Agricultural Research Service. The Los Alamos of Research in the areas of food, fuel, fibers, flowers and forests has seen flat budgets since the 1990’s.

Instead of funding research which in the past has produced effective work in human nutrition and crop health, environmental adaptation and protect, and increased safe production of food and fiber, while enhancing our flowers and forests, we let the primary basic research slowly decline. Rather than funding proactive possibilities in production techniques, we call for more after-the-fact reactive regulation. We of course need both not just one.
“The fresh-cut produce industry is a rapidly growing $10 to $12 billion a year industry, accounting for over 10% of all produce sales in the U.S., and has an annual growth rate in the double digits. However, along with the rapid development of this industry, new problems have arisen in the food safety area. Various sanitizers, which are effective in reducing foodborne pathogen populations on whole produce, are not as effective on fresh-cut produce. Also, the extensive use of these sanitizers has resulted in various foodborne pathogens developing resistance to them. Naturally occurring bacteriophages, or viruses of bacteria, may be viable alternatives to sanitizers.”[i]

This country should be clamoring for additional research in areas yet unimagined. And while we cry for enforcement and regulation, we quietly ignore a looming problem of increased CO2 on current crop yields. We worry about food safety, food, which we may not have in the decades to come. Rather than fund research into alternative crops for bio-fuel production, we remove food from the food supply to feed our energy needs. ARS BARC should be a leader in the study of alternative crops which would allow us to leave corn for food, but instead we allow a dozen researchers a year to retire or leave the service and then do find the money to replace them let alone increase the number of programs.

Critical new systems are needed as well as past enforcement practices. We must fund BARC, and its failing sister the National Agricultural Library, NAL, which stores and distributes the information we need to know to live better , safer, healthier lives.

[i] USDA ARS National Agricultural Research Center – Beltsville: http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publications.htm?SEQ_NO_115=156730

Friday, May 02, 2008

BARC & NAL: National Security and the Presidential Election

Below is a copy of a message sent to the three major political candidates for President of the United States of America. Somehow, the idea that food is a national security issue needs to be brought to the forefront of our presidential debate. The work of USDA at BARC, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, and other ARS sites, and the information collected and distributed by NAL, the National Agricultural Library needs recognition at a national level. We need safe food, and a strong production, unless we think that we should send our food production off shore and depend on the largess of others.
The science of food production and safety needs national attention. Pests which eat our food drive up costs. Invasive species, mammals, fish, insects, fungi, diseases and other organisms, which include weeds, compete for resources limiting production. Climate change demands new crop varieties. cultivars and strains. When we add bio-fuels to the mix, knowing what we are doing becomes critical in policy making. Food safety is expected, and the science at BARC leads the way, assuming we do not let the funding disappear and the work migrate to India, China, Europe, Russia or other quite capable societies.
We can, of course, let other countries pick up the work that for almost a century has come from BARC and ARS, and buy our crucial information from foreign libraries. We can say that everything we need to know us found on “Google”, and pay the price tomorrow of our confusing information with knowledge. If we think it a challenge to depend on foreign fuel supplies, wait until we can not feed ourselves, because we have let the science of agricultural wilt upon our inaction.
I hope that someone connected to the campaigns might actually answer, but I have low expectations. If you can help get an answer from the candidates, please let me know. Will they support the continuing funding of long term agricultural research at levels that produce world class results as we have done for over a century, or will we simply fade into a second class existence and let others charge us for the privilege of eating? Will we let our natural areas which support free eco-services deteriorate or will we rise to the challenge and support research which will allow us to adapt to growing populations and changes in the environment without loosing our quality of life?
“I am seeking Senator (Clinton, Obama, McCain)’s specific support & position for scientific long term research programs at USDA ARS. www.NARA-B.org . I spend a considerable amount of my time as a volunteer with no financial support trying to get Congress and this administration to fund research in foods, fuels, fibers, flowers and forests, better known as ARS, Agricultural Research Service. (www.ipetrus.blogspot.com). The US national systematic collections which Homeland security depends upon are in a state of decline, and our food supply as well as our environment is under attack. USDA has long been the recognized leader for the world but now is suffering quick decline; the parasite collection which guarantees your meat is safe from disease is housed in the basement of a 70 year old barn with little to no funding; the scale insect position, scale causing 100’s of millions of dollars damage in North America each year is not vacant with no prospect of filling the position. Research into climate change and its impact on food crops as well as natural resources is scheduled to be quietly reduced because of funding challenges. As Secretary of the US National Invasive Species Advisory Committee, a FACA organization, I am dismayed to find that the US is falling behind in its scientific research in environmental impacts both to natural areas and to our food supply. I would like the opportunity to speak to someone with in the campaign about the candidate’s potential support. I shall be posting this request on my web log this weekend, and will be asking the other two major candidates the same question.”