Showing posts with label invasive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label invasive. Show all posts

Friday, May 17, 2013

More invasive species detected at US ports in the Mid Atlantic


               Insect as well as plant and animal species from around the world can hitch a ride in a manner of speaking, on cargo shipments, moving from their native lands to exotic foreign destinations, and sometimes stay and establish a new home. Ports of entry like Baltimore and Norfolk are doorways to establishment of species that may impact livelihoods by altering the characteristic services of ecological systems.

               The front-line of defense is the U. S. CBP,
"one of the Department of Homeland Security’s largest and most complex components, with a priority mission of keeping terrorists and their weapons out of the U.S. It also has a responsibility for securing the border and facilitating lawful international trade and travel while enforcing hundreds of U.S. laws and regulations, including immigration and drug laws. Amopng other tasks," CBP performs two crucial roles in facilitating trade to and from the U.S. and around the globe: securing it from acts of terrorism and assuring that goods arriving in the U.S. are legitimate and that appropriate duties and fees are paid."[1]

Working with USDA ARS Systematic Entomology Laboratory and USDA APHIS Plant Inspection Stations, and APHIS Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ). the organizations work to protect American jobs, businesses and the ecosystems that support them. Recent interceptions of non-native and potentially harmful insect species provide  highlights of the impossible nature of their underfunded mission. USDA APHIS PPQ reported at the Maryland Invasive Species Council's May 2013 meeting the following interceptions.

Macroglossum stellatarum
tpittaway.tripod.com

               At the port in Norfolk, Virginia CBP intercepted for the first time, Macroglossum stellatarum  Linnaeus (1758), the hummingbird hawk-moth. The moth is found though out most of Europe, Asia and Northern Africa. While the species is unable to survive cold winters, the adults are strong enough fliers that they seasonally migrate from the Mediterranean region North to Sweden & Iceland. The Encyclopedia of Life notes that
"The hummingbird hawk-moth is named for its long proboscis (straw like mouth) and its hovering behavior, which, accompanied by an audible humming noise, give it remarkable resemblance to a hummingbird as it visits flowers to feed on nectar."[2]
Humans see various shades of dull brown or grey in the forewings of the moth. On the other hand, they reveal characteristic fluorescent yellow, violet, purple and green patterns under ultraviolet light . Thus to birds and other insects the moth is most likely brightly patterned.[3]

Coreus marginatus
www.britishbugs.org.uk
               The Port of Norfolk also saw for the first time the arrival and discovery of Coreus marginatus Linnaeus (1758). The uninvited accidental visitor was found in a shipment of tile from Italy. This species if found throughout most of Europe where it feeds on plants in the genus Rumex. In addition inspectors also discovered at the Norfolk facility an adult moth hiding out amongst military cargo. The moth was identified as Autophila ligaminosa Eversmann (1851). This is the first time this species found in the sub-alpine region from the Balkans west to Afghanistan has been identified entering the US.  
Autophila ligaminosa 
www.ppis.moag.gov.il -


               In the historic rivalry between Virginia and Maryland, the Port of Baltimore was not without its own early detection of non native visitors taking advantage of the enormous flow of global trade. And to make matters even worse one of the interception was yet another stink bug. Baltimore CBP found a moderate sized stinkbug in a shipment of tile that was later identified to be Sciocoris sideritidis Wollaston (1858). This is the first time this species has been identified entering the US. Just wait until an undetected mating pair of this new species to the shores of the United States sets up shop and works with the two existing invasive stink bugs already sucking their way through vegetables, fruits, and soya beans. Reducing USDA funding through political mismanagement and grand standing in Congress is a sure way to encourage this opportunity. 

Sciocoris sideritidis
www.naturedugard.org 

             And last but not least, remembering that airports are ports too, a baggage interception in Baltimore was confirmed to be Tetraleurodes andropogoni Dozier (1934), a type of white fly. This is the first time this species have been intercepted entering the US.  According to CPB "the insects were discovered on fresh leaves being carried by a passenger originating from Nigeria and arriving from the United Kingdom."[4]  



[2] EOL. Macroglossum stellatarum. [accessed May 17, 2013] http://eol.org/pages/396579/overview
[3] Macroglossum Scopoli, 1777, Introd. Hist. nat.: 414. [accessed May 17, 2013] http://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/m_ste.htm
[4] Baltimore CBP Intercepts First in Nation Whitefly. Thursday, April 11, 2013. [accessed May 17, 2013] http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/local/04112013_7.xml

Friday, April 26, 2013

Updating the Bamboo Wars in Connecticut - Question on the Table

Seems that the Connecticut General Assembly has decided for the moment to side step running bamboo legislation by using the time-honored motion of setting the bill on the table, more commonly referred to as tabled, at least for today; and with the end of the session coming up quickly - maybe gone for good.  

According to a recent posting on the Facebook site, Institute of Invasive Bamboo Research


"Old Burying Ground - Byram Shore, Greenwich, Conn. under invasion by Yellow Groove bamboo. * S.B.1016 REGULATE RUNNING BAMBOO has been tabled - Needs to be Voted on now. The Constituents of Connecticut will not let this bill die."  

The accompanying photograph of a bamboo species taking over a cemetery is a nice touch. 


Old Burying Ground - Byram Shore, Greenwich, Conn. - complete with bamboo

Here is the most current legislative analysis curtesy of the CGA website:

OLR Bill Analysis
sSB 1016
AN ACT REGULATING THE PLANTING AND SALE OF RUNNING BAMBOO.
SUMMARY:
This bill makes people liable for failing to contain “running bamboo” (ie, bamboo in the genus Phyllostachys, including yellow-groove bamboo) on their property beginning October 1, 2013It requires a 100-foot setback from abutting property and a public right of way for running bamboo planted after that date, unless it is properly containedIt also requires people who sell or install running bamboo to educate customers on the plant's growing habits, the bill's provisions, and recommended containment methods.
The bill subjects violators of its setback or containment provisions to a 100 fineIt also subjects violators of its education requirements to a 100 fine, for each plantFines may be mailed to the Central Infractions Bureau without a court appearance.
Lastly, the bill (1) authorizes the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, in conjunction with the Department of Consumer Protection, and (2) requires environmental conservation officers, to enforce the setback, containment, and education requirements.
EFFECTIVE DATEUpon passage, except the environmental conservation officers' enforcement powers are effective October 1, 2013.
LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY
Beginning October 1, 2013, the bill makes people who plant running bamboo, or allow it to be planted, on their property liable for any damage the bamboo causes to neighboring properties, including the cost of removing any bamboo that spread to neighboring propertyIt prohibits people from allowing running bamboo to grow beyond their property boundaries.
SETBACK OR CONTAINMENT REQUIRED
The bill requires anyone planting or allowing running bamboo to be planted on his or her property after October 1, 2013 to plant it at least 100 feet from an abutting property or public right-of-wayBut it allows a person to plant within 100 feet if the running bamboo is properly containedThe containment system must be (1) a properly constructed and maintained barrier system or (2) an above ground container that does not allow the bamboo to come in contact with the ground's soil.
Violators are subject to a 100 fine, and each day of a continuing violation is a separate offense.
EDUCATING PURCHASERS
The bill requires retail sellers and installers of running bamboo to provide purchasers of the plant with a statement that includes:
1a disclosure that running bamboo is a fast growing plant that may spread if not properly contained;
2a plain language summary of the billand
3recommendations on how to properly contain the bamboo, based on the best available information.
Violators are subject to a 100 fine for each plant sold without the required statement.
COMMITTEE ACTION
Environment Committee
Joint Favorable Substitute

Yea
28
Nay
0
(03/25/2013)

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Invasive species 'boxbug' tries to sneak past APHIS

Gonocerus acuteangulatus (Goeze 1778)
boxbug
image from British Bugs web site


               Invasive species are all around us. The eat our lunch, they make us sick, and they change our landscapes. Invasive species cost us money...lots of money...some say over 130 billion dollars a year in the United States alone. Most of only get excited about invasive species when they directly and immediately injure us personally.  We remain landscape illiterate convinces that food comes from stores, and clean water from pipes.

               The United States Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS) works to stave off the introduction and establishment of harmful invasive species.[1] APHIS and its ever-smaller budgets is faced with more "stuff' coming in to US ports each year. And who is APHIS' stakeholder that should be clamoring for increases to protect our pockets, food, and health? Why we the very people who have no clue. Somehow we have the idea that the infrastructure started by Lincoln and enhanced by Presidents through the 1960s now needs no support at all. Our arrogance is only unsurpassed by our inability to see tomorrow.

               If you live in the Mid-Atlantic you already know about the stink bug because it decided to not only cost the fruit industry millions but more importantly for you, because it moved in by the thousands to your personal space and caused you discomfort. So you call on APHIS and demand to know why and then fail to give it the money to prevent the next critter from moving in.

               With little support from the calmly disinterested public (those without stink bugs, pythons, flying fish and rock snot in their lives so far), the dedicated employees of APHIS and its sister organizations ARS and the Forest Service) work to keep the next invader out of your personal space. They work tirelessly to safeguard the United States much like the heroic 'Little Dutch boy' who stuck his finger in a hole in the dike to save his world from certain doom.

              And what has APHIS done lately for you - especially those of you who garden or make your living selling plants? In December, the keen eyes of USDA APHIS port inspectors in Baltimore, Maryland spotted for the first time a Coreid, Gonocerus acuteangulatus (Goeze 1778). G. acuteangulatus, commonly called known as a boxbug in the United Kingdom, id a "relatively large reddish-brown squashbug, distinguished from the commoner Coreus marginatus by the narrower abdomen and more pointed lateral extremities of the pronotum. Nymphs have a green abdomen." The website, British Bugs, goes on to describe this new invader to the US as historically very rare in the British Isles and known only from Box Hill in Surrey, where it feeds on box trees (boxwoods). British Buigs continues its report noting that the "bug is expanding its range and now occurs widely in the south-east of England and beyond. It is exploiting different foodplants, and has been found on hawthorn, buckthorn, yew and plum trees." Reports from England report that it seems prefers berry bearing species such as hollies and ivies.[2]  The boxbug is also reported as a major problem for hazelnut production in Italy.[3]

               APHIS also reports that the recently intercepted boxbug, G. acuteangulatust is a primary pest of boxwood, but is also recorded feeding on important landscape and garden plants such as hawthorn, buckthorn, yew and plum trees. According to a report in the Washington Times, the boxbug, referred to as a squashbug in the article, was "destined for Eldersburg, Md.  CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) issued an Emergency Action Notification to the importer requiring the shipment to be re-exported or destroyed."[4]

               The possible introduction of this invasive pest would add to the litany of invasive species problems facing farmers and gardeners in the United States. We, all of us, should be actively supporting enhanced funding for USDA APHIS. It is worth noting that APHIS also quietly protects natural areas from invasive species that creep through our trade routes into our ports and out into our fields and woods.
 



[1] The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is a multi-faceted Agency with a broad mission area that includes protecting and promoting U.S. agricultural health, regulating genetically engineered organisms, administering the Animal Welfare Act and carrying out wildlife damage management activities.  These efforts support the overall mission of USDA, which is to protect and promote food, agriculture, natural resources and related issues.

To protect agricultural health, APHIS is on the job 24 hours a day, 7 days a week working to defend America’s animal and plant resources from agricultural pests and diseases.  For example, if the Mediterranean fruit fly and Asian longhorned beetle, two major agricultural pests, were left unchecked, they would result in several billions of dollars in production and marketing losses annually.  Similarly, if foot-and-mouth disease or highly pathogenic avian influenza were to become established in the United States, foreign trading partners could invoke trade restrictions and producers would suffer devastating losses.    http://www.aphis.usda.gov/about_aphis/
[3] Vaccino et al. 2008. Detection of damage due to bug feeding on hazelnut and wheat by biochemical techniques. Bulletin of Insectology 61 (1): 189-190.
[4] Jerry Seper. December 12, 2012. ‘Squashbug’ nabbed at Baltimore Harbor. The Washington Time. [accessed January 19, 2013] http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/12/squashbug-nabbed-baltimore-harbor/
"The importer plans to fumigate.
Upon Friday’s discovery of the bug, CBP forwarded the specimen to a USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine entomologist for identification. CBP agriculture specialists work closely with USDA to protect the nation’s agriculture resources against the introduction of foreign plant pests and animal diseases.
CBP agriculture specialists have extensive training and experience in the biological sciences and agricultural inspection. On a typical day, they inspect tens of thousands of international air passengers, and air and sea cargoes nationally being imported to the United States and seize 4,291 prohibited meat, plant materials or animal products, including 470 insect pests."


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/12/squashbug-nabbed-baltimore-harbor/#ixzz2IQluwQPK
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Some bamboos run into legal barriers - legislative updates - a wicked inconvenience


                                         
The noxious, invasive in some places invasive bamboo wars continue to grow and spread. In some sense they are 'popping up' as fast as the plant they have identified as their number one here and now enemy of the personal good.

The local weed warriors are challenged because their needs are not obvious to the disinterested rest of us, and because recent history has made an artificial division between agriculture's noxious weeds and ecology's invasive species. To the beleaguered property owner it is all the same destructive incursion and infestations that deny them the use of their property.  

Local and state government are slow to act because they count voted and so far the documented infestations of problematic bamboo are dwarfed by species such as mile-a-minutebuffelgrass, tamarisk and kudzu, and because the invaded properties do not yet equal a constituency that can sway elections - mostly because it is fragmented and divided as to particular species of concern or method of control. 

Who should pay to clean up the mess is the large elephant in our national political discussion from guns to energy, bamboo to atmospheric gas ratios, we have met the enemy and it is us. We do not want to pay for what we throw over our garden fences whether at the scale of an individual, a corporation or a nation-state.

We face a wicked inconvenience - plants that seem to misbehave are symptoms of our own unwillingness to take responsibility for our own actions. 
        


UPDATED 12-16- 2012                                                                                  INSTITUTE OF INVASIVE  BAMBOO  RESEARCH
Delaware:
1. Dover, DE                                                                                             Bamboo Ban http://bugwood.blogspot.com/2012/07/invasive-bamboo-outlawed-in-dover.html
2.Smyrna, DE                                                                                          10 foot set back http://search.municode.com/html/12853/level3/PTIITOCO_CH74VE_ARTIVBA.html
3.Lewis Park   Newark, DE                                                                    Bamboo Ban – destroying tennis court  http://www.cityofnewarkde.us/archives/61/Bamboo%20Removal_with%20photos.pdf

New York:
4.Hempstead, NY                                                                                   Bamboo Ban                                                                             http://elmontcivic.com/index.php/town-news/351-hempstead-town-adopts-legislation-to-ban-invasive-bamboo-on-local-properties
5.Brookhaven, NY                                                                                  Bamboo Ban                                                                     http://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/bamboo-ban-plans-reach-long-beach-brookhaven-1.3846701
6. Smithtown, NY                                                                                   10 foot set back                                                              http://ecode360.com/15100285?highlight=bamboo#15100285
7. Village of Branch, NY                                                                        10 foot set back                                                              http://villageofthebranch.homestead.com/bamboo.html
8. Saltaire, NY                                                                                         Bamboo Ban                                                                 http://www.saltaire.org/bamboo.pdf
9. Greenport Village, NY                                                                       Bamboo Ban                                                            http://suffolktimes.timesreview.com/2012/06/32943/greenport-village-considers-a-bamboo-ban/
10.Oyster Bay, NY                                                                                                                                                                 http://oysterbay.going.com/articles/tell-us-bamboo-epidemic-in-tobay-7b2ccb97
11.Long Beach, NY                                                                                                                                                                      http://longbeach.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/city-council-votes-to-restrict-bamboo-plantings

12. Woodsburgh, NY                                                                            Bamboo Ban                                             http://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/woodsburgh-restricts-bamboo-cats-dogs-1.2819294
13.Babylon Village, NY                                                                         Bamboo Ban         http://www.lilanduseandzoning.com/2012/09/11/several-long-island-municipalities-adopt-bamboo-restrictions/
14.New York *called upon to add to states invasive list               unanimous vote                     http://www.northshoreoflongisland.com/Articles-Opinion-i-2012-09-27-93819.112114-sub-Editorial-Council-should-be-the-panda.html
15. Islip, NY                                                                                            proposed                                                                                  http://sachem.patch.com/articles/islip-notebook-town-looks-to-limit-bamboo-growth
16.Lake Grove, NY                                                                                                                            http://www.northshoreoflongisland.com/Articles-News-i-2012-09-27-93884.112114-sub-Huntington-Town-seeks-state-aid-with-pesky-bamboo-plant.html
17.Huntington, NY                                                                               proposed Dec 18 2012 resolution hearing                                                                                                                         http://www.northshoreoflongisland.com/Articles-News-i-2012-09-27-93884.112114
18. Ocean Beach, Fire Island, NY                                                      Bamboo Ban                                                           http://www.ecode360.com/7717482

New Jersey:
19.Wall, NJ                                                                                                                    http://www.wallnj.com/legal/2012/2012-21.pdf
20. Raritan, NJ                                                                                      proposed                                                                                   http://www.nj.com/hunterdon-county-democrat/index.ssf/2012/10/public_works_superintendent_ba.html
21.Toms River, NJ                                                                                                                               http://tomsriver.patch.com/articles/toms-river-to-crack-down-on-invasive-plants
22.Brick, NJ                                                                                                                                                                               http://brick.patch.com/articles/brick-officials-work-to-curb-invasive-plants                                                                                                                                                       
23.Lacey, NJ                                                                                                                                                             http://lacey.going.com/articles/committee-to-vote-on-wild-plant-ordinance-at-meeting-thursday
24.Lake Como, NJ                                                                                 proposed                                                                   http://haleybehre.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/9-27-bamboo.pdf   
25.Manchester, NJ                                                                                                                                                            http://manchester-nj.patch.com/articles/environmental-commission-considers-invasive-plants-ordinance
26.Long Branch, NJ                                                                                                                 http://www.app.com/videonetwork759857/1823122521001/Homeowner-speaks-about-invasive-bamboo
Pennsylvania:
27. Concord, PA                                                                                       10 foot set back http://delconewsnetwork.com/articles/2012/10/09/garnet_valley_press/news/doc50743effc1905506029621.txt
28.West Bradford, PA                                                                             40 foot set back    http://www.westbradford.org/downloads/2011Ordinances/11-01Bamboo.pdf
29.Rutledge, PA                                                                                       10 foot set back                                      http://www.rutledgepa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/bamboo-ord-461-dec-2011.pdf
30.Haverford, PA                                                                                                                       http://www.haverfordtownship.com/egov/docs/1317927418_850616.pdf
31.Middletown, PA                                                                         http://www.delcotimes.com/articles/2012/07/26/news/doc5010b9753a0e1332618081.txt
32.Rose Valley, PA                                                                                   proposed                                                                      http://www.rosevalleyborough.org/storage/minutes/rvbmins101012.pdf
33.Montgomery Township, PA                                                             proposed                                                     http://www.thereporteronline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20121128%2FNEWS01%2F121129591&template=printart
34. Doylestown, PA                                                                                 Bamboo classified Noxious - height 8 inches                                  http://www.doylestownpa.org/Download/Ordinances/No%20%20353.pdf_brush_grass_weeds.pdf

Maryland:
35.Mount Rainier, MD                                                                            Bamboo Ban proposed            
36.Cambridge, MD                                                                                    proposed              http://www.choosecambridge.com/index.php/news/667/208/City-Council-Minutes/
37.College Park, MD                                                                                                         http://www.collegeparkmd.gov/temp/Temp%20Docs/11-O-04.Chapter125.BAMBOO.pdf

Massachusetts:
38.Cambridge, MA                                                                                    proposing possible ban          http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x555035388/Cambridge-City-Council-in-60-seconds#axzz2FP8kh9lR



North Carolina:
39.Carolina Beach, NC                                                                                  proposed                          http://islandgazette.net/news-server5/index.php/news/local-and-state-news/local/16908-carolina-beach-considers-prohibiting-uncontrolled-bamboo-growth

Rhode Island:
40.Nether Providence, RI                                                                             10 foot set  back                   http://www.trulia.com/blog/stephen_sisman/2012/06/a_29

California:
41. Loma Linda, Ca                                                                                        Nuisance abatement                                                                                                                                http://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/asp/admin/CityCouncilDoc/getCDoc.asp?ID=293